Abjure
Abjure. Sacrifice a blue permanent. Counter target spell.
Game Play Comments:
Blue has a myriad of variations on the original Counterspell, which counter a target spell. Though for the most part none of them are quite as good as the original Counterspell. Cancel costs an extra mana, Mana Leak can be diffused if your opponent pays 3 mana, Deprive requires you to bounce a land. Others only counter certain types of spells (creatures, non-creatures, targeting spells, artifacts, etc). Double negate can counter 1 or 2 spells. Mindbreak Trap can counter any number of spells, and costs 4 mana (or 0 if it’s his 3rd+ spell this turn), and it’s technically not a “counter” – so it works on spells that can’t be countered (such as Terra Stomper and Emrakul the Aeons Torn). Effects that bounce your own cards (such as Into the Roil) can be similar to a Counterspell (if he targets your field card, then you bounce it, causing his spell to basically fizzle). Redirect and Swerve change the target of a spell. That’s a lot, yet this is not, by any stretch, a complete list of the variations on Counterspell. In fact, my examples were only from the current Standard format.
Abjure is one of the few counter spells that costs less mana than Counterspell. It’s not in the current Standard format, and it combos with Hatching Plans (also not currently in Standard). What if Abjure were in the current Standard format?
Abjure requires you to sac a Blue permanent. This makes it a lot harder to use than if it would let you sac any permanent – because then you could use non-blue tokens (Eldrazi tokens, Khalni Garden tokens, etc). Additionally, lands are (usually) colorless, so you can’t just sac an Island.
It might still combo with some Blue permanents that let you draw 1 – such as Spreading Seas, or Sea Gate Oracle. And Fieldmist Borderpost makes it more like "pay 1 mana and sac 1 land”. But even if it’s worth the sac (in exchange for the reduced converted mana cost), it would be easy to end up in a situation where you don’t have any blue permanents on the field. Or in a situation where you’re paying 1 mana and 1 usable permanent instead of just paying 2 mana (or 3 mana).
If the text read “sacrifice a permanent” (not just a blue one), then Abjure would easily compete with other counter spells. Either that, or it would only work in a deck with more cards like Hatching Plans, and maybe Spreading Seas, Sea Gate Oracle, Fieldmist Borderpost.
One final note. Abjure says “Interrupt” rather than an “Instant”. Interrupt used to mean it’s faster than Instant (in YuGiOh they have counter traps that are faster than traps and instant spells). However, Interrupt no longer exists, and any old cards that say Interrupt are now just synonymous with Instant. Since Interrupt has long been deprecated, in Standard you will only find Instant spells (not Interrupt spells).
abjure [ab-joor, -jur]
–verb (used with object), -jured, -jur·ing.
1. to renounce, repudiate, or retract, esp. with formal solemnity; recant: to abjure one’s errors.
2. to renounce or give up under oath; forswear: to abjure allegiance.
3. to avoid or shun.
1. to renounce or retract, esp formally, solemnly, or under oath
2. to abstain from or reject
Vocabulary Comments
In the flavor text, Ertai is expounding his virtues (ie, bragging), and it is annoying Mirri. Bombast is not very intellectual (and thus not very Blue), so Mirri decides that if Ertai doesn’t stop going on and on with his bombast, then Mirri will have to make him abjure the bombastic claims. The flavor text says Mirri considers to cause this by killing Ertai. This could mean Ertai is threatened into abjuring the claims, or that Mirri is abjuring the claim by killing Ertai, or that the claim is abjured in the sense that Ertai’s magic is shown to not be so powerful after all.
So either you are making your opponent abjure his casting of a spell, or you are abjuring the spell itself. In either case, the casting of the spell has been abjured.
Abjure can generally mean to avoid, shun, abstain from, or reject something. However, it has the connotation that you will renounce, repudiate, retract, or recant something in a manner that is formal and solemn.
This could have meaning in a legal sense, where a person is asked to abjure (or recant) their claim, position, belief, or stance on an issue. Such as Galileo Galilei, or Giordano Bruno, or Martin Luther, each having been asked to abjure claims by officials of the Catholic church.
In the US today, we tend to make more of a distinction between illegal action and illegal belief. Illegal belief tends to be a stronger form of legislating morality. For example, it’s okay to believe in the further legalization of marijuana or prostitution, as long as you don’t take actions that illegal. Of course you can still have plenty of unreasonable laws and persecution over someone’s beliefs, but we now tend to persecute the person based on an action, rather than directly on their stance. Though there’s probably exceptions, or it could (in some cases) only be a level of indirection.
I can not abjure my allegiance to Magic Vocabulary – I can not abjure my claim that there is a myriad of GRE vocab words in the world of Magic cards, just waiting to be discovered! How can one abjure this claim, when even the word abjure itself is in fact the name of a Magic card!
Pem (Admin) :: 2010/09/09 (Thursday, September 9, 2010) :: Games, magic vocab, tcg :: No Comments »
Del.icio.us
Digg
Technorati
Blinklist
Furl
reddit